Passive ETFs have become a larger component of the equity world, but for fixed income, and in particular municipal bonds, we believe active management will remain beneficial across market cycles."
Since their first U.S. listing in 1993, exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have transformed from a clever financial novelty to one of the most popular investment vehicles in modern capital markets. Early growth and mass use of ETFs emerged in equity markets, primarily in passive strategies that mirrored the S&P 500 Index or other broad equity benchmarks. With the rise of passive equity ETFs, coupled with the emergence of ETFs into other asset classes including fixed income, investors began embracing passive ETFs for their municipal bond exposure. But given the differences in the underlying securities and unique market dynamics in the equity and municipal markets, investors began to realize that many of the advantages of passive equity strategies are not realized for passive municipal offerings. As a result, active municipal ETFs have become more popular over the last several years because they can provide benefits unavailable from passive ETFs.
Downsides of Passive Municipal ETFs
Side Note: To be fair, simply choosing an active ETF does not guarantee outperformance for one’s municipal bond exposure. There are some potential downside by going active; active ETFs tend to have higher costs than their passive counterparts. There is also the risk the active manager may get market, duration2, or sector calls incorrect. These downsides are not unique to the municipal bond market, but rather are characteristic of active investing in general. Investors must consider the pros and cons of each type of investing style when selecting the type of investment that is right for their circumstances.
Bottom line: Passive ETFs have become a larger component of the equity world, but for fixed income, and in particular municipal bonds, we believe active management will remain beneficial across market cycles. Furthermore, it is important to select an active manager for municipal bond exposure with a demonstrated track record of providing characteristics that passive ETFs typically lack, such as credit oversight, positioning for seasonality, rebooking into higher book yields when possible and investing across the entirety of the municipal bond universe.